Role of Food Supply Chain Managers in Changing Food Safety Standards Environment

Vijay Sardana

Corporate managers feel very irritated with every change in food laws, because it forces them to think and work. The arguments given by them is why we need it, every thing was fine?

If we need sales promotion schemes to enhance sells, what is harm if food safety is enhanced in the interests of public health?

It is human nature; we don’t want change when we are comfortable. Whether it is pollution, global warming, traffic diversion, change in accounting laws, change in phone number, home address, so same is witnessed with changes in food laws. Neither consumers’ needs nor food safety status is static. We therefore need competent managers to manage and minimize risks including food safety risks.

Why New Food Safety Laws are emerging?

Safe food contributes to health and productivity and provides an effective platform for development and poverty alleviation. Its availability is a basic human right. People are becoming increasingly concerned about the health risks posed by microbial pathogens and potentially hazardous chemicals in food. According to WHO and FAO studies, up to one-third of the populations of industrialized and developed countries are affected by food borne illnesses each year, and the problem is likely to be even more widespread in developing countries. The poor are the most susceptible to ill health. Food and waterborne diarrhoeal diseases, for example, are leading causes of illness and death in less developed countries, killing an estimated 2.2 million people annually, most of whom are children.

Due to globalization of trade, emerging trends in global food production, processing, distribution and preparation present new challenges to food safety. Food grown in one country can now be transported and consumed halfway across the world. People demand a wider variety of foods than in the past; they want foods that are not in season and often eat away from home. Institutionalizing children in schools and childcare facilities and a growing number of elderly persons in hospitals and nursing homes mean that food for many is prepared by a few and can therefore be the source of major foodborne disease outbreaks if people care has not been taken. Greater life expectancy and increasing numbers of immuno-compromised people indicate a larger vulnerable population for whom unsafe food is often an even more serious threat.

WTO and WHO and its Member States have responded to these new challenges by recognizing that protecting food safety is an essential public health function. Food safety must be addressed along the entire food chain by measures based on sound scientific information.

Corporate managers have to implement these changes in public interest.

Why is food safety an essential public health issue?

Serious outbreaks of food borne disease have been documented on every continent in the past decade, illustrating both the public health and social significance of these diseases. Consumers everywhere view food borne disease outbreaks with ever-increasing concern. Outbreaks are likely, however, to be only the most visible aspect of a much broader, more persistent problem. Food borne diseases most seriously affect children, pregnant women, the elderly and people already affected by other diseases. Food borne diseases not only significantly affect people’s health and well being, but also have economic consequences for individuals, families, communities, businesses and countries. The experience of Dropsy cases due to edible oil contamination and recent controversy of pesticide residues in carbonated soft drinks and its impact on sale of products are clear example of consumer concern about food safety. These diseases impose a substantial burden on health-care systems and markedly reduce economic productivity. Poor people tend to live from day to day, and loss of income due to food borne illness perpetuates the cycle of poverty.

These reasons, on the other side, provide enough grounds to impose non-tariff barriers for food trade to protect domestic markets as well. To challenge these new non-tariff barriers will also need equal amount of scientific studies and justification to prove otherwise.

New Challenges to Food Safety

The globalization of the food trade offers many benefits to consumers. It results in a wider variety of high-quality foods that are accessible, affordable and safe, meeting consumer demand. A diversity of foods in a balanced diet improves nutritional status and health. The global food trade provides opportunities for food-exporting countries to earn foreign exchange, which is indispensable for the economic development of many countries and for improving the standard of living of many people.

However, these changes also present new challenges to safe food production and distribution and have been shown to have widespread repercussions on health. Food safety programmes are increasingly focusing on a farm-to-table approach as an effective means of reducing foodborne hazards. This holistic approach to the control of food-related risks involves consideration of every step in the chain, from raw material to food consumption. Hazards can enter the food chain on the farm and can continue to be introduced or exacerbated at any point in the chain until the food reaches the consumer.

The integration and consolidation of agricultural and food industries and the globalization of the food trade are changing the patterns of food production and distribution. These conditions are creating an environment in which both known and new food borne diseases can become prevalent. Food and feed are distributed over far greater distances than before, creating the conditions necessary for widespread outbreaks of food borne illnesses. In a recent crisis, more than 1500 farms in Europe received dioxin-contaminated feed from a single source over a two-week period. Food produced from animals given this contaminated fodder found its way onto every continent within weeks. The effects of exposure to dioxin from this source on public health may become known only after years of investigation. The international spread of meat and bone meal prepared from cattle affected by bovine spongiform encephalitis (BSE) needs no further description. The full economic consequences of such incidents and the anxiety raised among consumers are still being assessed.

Other factors account for the emergence of food safety as a public health issue. Increasing urbanization leads to greater requirements for transport, storage and preparation of food. Increasing wealth, an urban lifestyle and sometimes a lack of facilities lead the people to eat much of their food away from home. In developing countries, food is often prepared by street vendors. In developed countries, up to 50% of the food budget may be spent on food prepared outside the home. All these changes lead to situations in which a single source of contamination can have widespread, even global consequences. Developing countries in particular are experiencing rapid changes in their health and social environments, and the strains on their limited resources are compounded by expanding urbanization, increasing dependence on stored foods and insufficient access to safe water and facilities for safe food preparation.

Although significant progress has been made in many countries in making food safer, thousands of millions of people become ill each year from eating contaminated food. The emergence of increased antimicrobial resistance in bacteria causing disease is aggravating the situation. The public is increasingly aware of the risks posed by pathogenic microorganisms and chemical substances in the food supply. The introduction of new technologies, including genetic engineering and irradiation, in this climate of concern about food safety is posing a special challenge. Some new technologies will increase agricultural production and make food safer, but their usefulness and safety must be demonstrated if they are to be accepted by consumers. Furthermore, the evaluation must be participatory, transparent and conducted using internationally agreed methods.

Until recently, most systems for regulating food safety were based on legal definitions of unsafe food, enforcement programmes for the removal of unsafe food from the market and sanctions for the responsible parties after the fait accompli. These traditional systems cannot respond to existing and emerging challenges to food safety because they do not provide or stimulate a preventive approach. During the past decade, there was a transition to risk analysis based on better scientific knowledge of food borne illness and its causes. This provides a preventive basis for regulatory measures for food safety at both national and international levels. The risk-based approach must be backed by information on the most appropriate and effective means to control foodborne hazards.

Food Hazards don’t respect borders and brands

Food borne disease is major cause of concern worldwide. It takes a major toll on health. Millions of people fall ill and many of them die as a result of eating unsafe food. Due the growing incidences of food borne illnesses, the Fifty-third World Health Assembly in May 2000, adopted a resolution calling upon the World Health Organization (WHO) and its Member States to recognize food safety as an essential public health function. The resolution also called on WHO to develop a Global Strategy for reducing the burden of food borne disease.

Major issues in food safety

Foodborne illness can be caused by microbiological, chemical or physical hazards. An increasing body of scientific data is highlighting the nature and extent of these risks, although several areas of information gathering, such as the surveillance of foodborne illness, need to be strengthened. There is also mounting concern about new technologies like the introduction of genetically modified organisms into the food supply.

Food Safety and Food Marketing

It is observed that many marketing managers, due to their non-food background are not willing to appreciate the food concern. Senior management often is only concerned about the turnover and profitability. It very clear that food safety is neither easy nor a game of general knowledge. Major corporate would over face food recall. Clearly indicates things are not in control even at big corporate and big brand owners. Assuming that every thing is fine can be a disaster. Senior managers must audit food safety regularly and companies must be audited to find out what percentage of turnover is spent upon food safety related issues.

Cost estimates for foodborne illnesses

According to WHO, approximately 1.8 million children in developing countries (excluding China) died from diarrhoeal disease in 1998, caused by microbiological agents, mostly originating from food and water. One person in three in industrialized countries may be affected by foodborne illnesses each year. In the USA, some 76 million cases of foodborne illnesses, resulting in 3,25,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths, are estimated to occur each year. There are only limited data on the economic consequences of food contamination and foodborne disease. In USA alone in 1995, it was estimated that the annual cost of the 3.3–12 million cases of foodborne illnesses caused by seven pathogens was US $6.5–35 billion. The medical costs and the value of the lives lost during just five foodborne outbreaks in England and Wales in 1996 were estimated at UK£ 300–700 million. The cost of the estimated 11 500 daily cases of food poisoning in Australia was calculated at AU$ 2.6 billion annually.

Food Safety Assurance: Challenge for India’s Food Industry

The differentiation between “Product of Export Quality” and “Products for Domestic Market” in the name of food quality and safety itself exposes the concern and commitment about food safety in India by all-important stakeholders like producers, manufactures and government policies. This differentiation in food safety standards itself is a shameful admission that Indian manufacturers cannot offer safe food to common man in India what they are offering to consumers outside India and this admission itself is a major hurdle for growth in food exports.

Traditional food safety measures, employed by producers, processors and distributors have not been efficient in preventing foodborne disease over the last decades. This is clearly evident from the rejection of food products in world market and also increasing imported food bill shows consumers desire for better quality.

Where there is a trust, there is a turnover

India’s goal of improving exports of food products can only be met with success by reducing the public health burden of foodborne disease. This can best be achieved through systematic application of risk analysis and capacity building.

Structures and systems must therefore be developed, in close coordination with international agencies at national, regional and international levels to survey foodborne diseases, conduct risk assessments and implement risk management strategies.

Capacity building and coordination of scientific effort are essential roles of international agencies and are important elements of Food Safety Strategy, but these must be combined with strong commitment and resources by Government of India and State governments in order to ensure food safety through targeted, risk-based prevention initiatives.

Effective participation of all stakeholders, especially producers, processors, food distributors and research organizations is needed in setting standards as well as guides for food safety initiatives that are acceptable to buyers both in domestic as well as international markets.

While the existing activities in food safety have focused primarily on hazards in food, the proposed strategy should address the broader concept of risk along the entire food production chain. It will take into consideration the need for sustainable agricultural production systems in all regions and will redirect some of the existing approaches to ensure that they meet the emerging challenges of global food safety.

The biggest hurdle and challenge to achieve food safety in India is not the money or technology. It is outdated mindset and ignorance about the ground reality among exporters and decisions makers at all levels both in private as well government organizations. Unfortunately money cannot bring the change it is the knowledge about changing markets that will play a major role; role of money is limited. It may facilitate change.

In globalised economy, consumers have the options but what about producers, processors and distributors? If consumers want safe or better food they may go for imported foods.

Consumers have choice to change the suppliers and veto any product and brand. Without assured food safety, what will happen to any brand and company is basic question?

In food business, “where there is a trust, there is turnover.” 

 

ALSO READ

1
2
3
4
 

Managing IPR

Managing Intellectual Property

Managing Intellectual Property

“Managing Intellectual Property” is a series of articles on intellectual property rights in the trade related matters. The series covers various dimensions of IPR, pertainign to the food processing industry, in the form of simplified legal text with suitable cases studies. We hope the series will benefit the food processors, policy makers, executives, managers, researchers, traders and other stakeholders in the processed food industry.Read More

Current Topics

Current Topics

‘Current topics’ provides the rapid advances in the food processing sector that have taken place in the recent past. The series is being contributed by Dr. V.H Potty – our editorial consultant and Deputy Director (Rtd), CFTRI. He is the doyen of food processing industry in India. We feel that an intensive review of the major issues concerning food processing industry would be of great value to our readers.

Read More

Recent Development

Recent Development

New developments in the sphere of processed food industry take place every now and then, which results in the overall development of the entire food sector. Dr. Rajat K. Baisya — our editorial consultant, and professor of marketing and strategic management at department of management studies, IIT Delhi — keeps a keen eye on these developments in food processing sector as and when they happen. The series has recently passed its 200 mark in its print version.
Read More

Cold Chain

Cold Chain Management

Keeping in view the importance of freezing and cold chain in food business 'Processed Food Industry' has decided to introduce a new series of article ‘A to Z of Frozen Food Operation’. The series is contributed by O S Gautam — a known food consultant and Director, Delicacy International — is being presented here. We hope our readers will be benefited by his experience and give us their feedback.
Read More

Supply Chain

Supply Chain

“Managing Supply Chain & Marketing of Food Products” The purpose of initiating this series of articles is to discus some important dimensions of food processing industry, which can be of some help for decision makers at various levels in food business. This series looks into macro-economic policy parameters, which affect food consumption and retailing patterns and consumer behaviours. We will also evaluate various micro-level developments in processed-food-industry world and their impact on food business, food retailing and consumer behaviour.
Read More

Events

 
 
anutec-india-2020
Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved | Designed & Developed by Netnovaz Web Solutions